Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
BMJ ; 369: m2244, 2020 06 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231731
2.
BMJ ; 380: 489, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2247929
4.
JAMA ; 328(21): 2162-2163, 2022 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2172144
5.
BMJ ; 379: o2397, 2022 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053193
6.
BMJ ; 377: o1561, 2022 06 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909716
7.
BMJ ; 376: o631, 2022 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1794517
8.
BMJ ; 377: o976, 2022 04 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788946
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(6): 1097-1100, 2022 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1705124

ABSTRACT

We assessed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission between patients in shared rooms in an academic hospital between September 2020 and April 2021. In total, 11 290 patients were admitted to shared rooms, of whom 25 tested positive. Among 31 exposed roommates, 12 (39%) tested positive within 14 days. Transmission was associated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle thresholds ≤21.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Academic Medical Centers , Hospitalization , Humans , Risk Factors
11.
BMJ ; 376: o85, 2022 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1622047
12.
Lancet ; 398(10316): 2109-2124, 2021 12 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1598178

ABSTRACT

Understanding the spread of SARS-CoV-2, how and when evidence emerged, and the timing of local, national, regional, and global responses is essential to establish how an outbreak became a pandemic and to prepare for future health threats. With that aim, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response has developed a chronology of events, actions, and recommendations, from December, 2019, when the first cases of COVID-19 were identified in China, to the end of March, 2020, by which time the outbreak had spread extensively worldwide and had been characterised as a pandemic. Datapoints are based on two literature reviews, WHO documents and correspondence, submissions to the Panel, and an expert verification process. The retrospective analysis of the chronology shows a dedicated initial response by WHO and some national governments, but also aspects of the response that could have been quicker, including outbreak notifications under the International Health Regulations (IHR), presumption and confirmation of human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and, most importantly, the public health response of many national governments. The chronology also shows that some countries, largely those with previous experience with similar outbreaks, reacted quickly, even ahead of WHO alerts, and were more successful in initially containing the virus. Mapping actions against IHR obligations, the chronology shows where efficiency and accountability could be improved at local, national, and international levels to more quickly alert and contain health threats in the future. In particular, these improvements include necessary reforms to international law and governance for pandemic preparedness and response, including the IHR and a potential framework convention on pandemic preparedness and response.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Animals , COVID-19/transmission , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Information Dissemination , International Cooperation , International Health Regulations , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Time Factors , World Health Organization , Zoonoses/virology
14.
J Hosp Med ; 16(2): 127, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1058642
15.
BMJ ; 368: m1040, 2020 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-8881
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL